Commentary

Conundrums in the surgical intensive care unit: fevers and antibiotic prophylaxis

Abstract

This editorial is in response to the three latest clinical consensus guidelines authored by the Critical Care Committee of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Herein, we discuss their main findings and recommendations and their impact on the practice of Surgical Critical Care.

The Critical Care Committee of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma has produced a series of Clinical Consensus Guidelines, the latest three of which focus on surgical infections and their treatment. The committee authors thoughtfully provide guiding commentary, especially in areas where strong evidence in the literature is lacking; that is, the unique space that these consensus guidelines fill. These latest guidelines cover the evaluation of fever and antibiotic prophylaxis after injury and peri-procedurally.1–3

The authors eloquently provided a broad sweeping discussion on fever evaluation, including both infectious and non-infectious pathogenesis, which interestingly are a 50/50 split in occurrence in the surgical intensive care unit. The tension in the article—similar to that of caring for critically ill patients—lies in appropriately recognizing and treating sepsis, where we know that early antibiotics are essential in improving outcomes,4 and avoiding unnecessary antibiotic use, in a world of growing antibiotic resistance primarily driven by overuse.5 6 Table 3 of the Norha et al article provides an excellent overview and quick reference that every surgical intensivist should have committed to memory or readily available for reference.

The consensus on post-injury antibiotic prophylaxis is underscored by the importance of targeted prophylaxis in trauma patients and balancing infection prevention with judicious antibiotic use. This practical guide categorizes recommendations by injury type and severity, further stratified by level of evidence. This consensus document is invaluable for trauma providers, streamlining antibiotic choices and ultimately optimizing patient care and minimizing the emergence of antibiotic resistance and should be incorporated into the practice management guidelines of each institution.

Lastly, the consensus on peri-procedural antibiotic prophylaxis in the surgical intensive care unit is most notable for recommending a single pre-procedural dose of antibiotics for most procedures. For promptly treated traumatic bowel injuries, antibiotics should not be continued beyond 24 hours. Cefazolin is appropriate in most cases, but consideration should be given to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or gram-negative/anaerobic coverage based on the surgical indication. As above, antibiotic stewardship is paramount to limiting unnecessary exposure and resistance in our highly susceptible surgical and trauma intensive care unit population.

Guidelines/Algorithms | 3 June 2024
Fever and infections in surgical intensive care: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee clinical consensus document

Eden Nohra, Rachel D Appelbaum, Michael Steven Farrell, Thomas Carver, Hee Soo Jung, Jordan Michael Kirsch, Lisa M Kodadek, Samuel Mandell, Aussama Khalaf Nassar, Abhijit Pathak, Jasmeet Paul, Bryce Robinson, Joseph Cuschieri, Deborah M Stein

Guidelines/Algorithms | 3 June 2024
Surgical and procedural antibiotic prophylaxis in the surgical ICU: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee clinical consensus document

Michael Steven Farrell, John Varujan Agapian, Rachel D Appelbaum, Dina M Filiberto, Rondi Gelbard, Jason Hoth, Randeep Jawa, Jordan Kirsch, Matthew E Kutcher, Eden Nohra, Abhijit Pathak, Jasmeet Paul, Bryce Robinson, Joseph Cuschieri, Deborah M Stein

Guidelines/Algorithms | 3 June 2024
Antibiotic prophylaxis in injury: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee clinical consensus document

Rachel D Appelbaum, Michael S Farrell, Rondi B Gelbard, J Jason Hoth, Randeep S Jawa, Jordan M Kirsch, Samuel Mandell, Eden A Nohra, Tanya Rinderknecht, Susan Rowell, Joseph Cuschieri, Deborah M Stein

  • Contributors: All authors participated in the conception of the work and participated in writing and editing the work.

  • Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review: Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication:
Ethics approval:

Not applicable.

  1. close Nohra E, Appelbaum RD, Farrell MS, et al. Fever and infections in surgical intensive care: an American Association for the surgery of trauma critical care committee clinical consensus document. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2024; 9.
  2. close Appelbaum RD, Farrell MS, Gelbard RB, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in injury: an American Association for the surgery of trauma critical care committee clinical consensus document. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2024; 9.
  3. close Farrell MS, Agapian JV, Appelbaum RD, et al. Surgical and procedural antibiotic prophylaxis in the surgical ICU: an American Association for the surgery of trauma critical care committee clinical consensus document. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2024; 9.
  4. close Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Crit Care Med 2021; 49:e1063–143.
  5. close Chatterjee A, Modarai M, Naylor NR, et al. Quantifying drivers of antibiotic resistance in humans: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 2018; 18:e368–78.
  6. close Kalil AC, Timsit JF. Less is more: critically ill status is not a carte blanche for unlimited antibiotic use. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46:2075–8.

  • First published: 3 June 2024